Follow topics & set alerts with myFT
国企共赢ETF紧密跟踪富时中国国企开放共赢指数，富时中国国企开放共赢指数旨在反映在中国内地和香港上市的中国国有企业(国企)的表现，重点关注于全球化和可持续发展。本指数旨在用于创建指数跟踪基金，以及用作业绩表现基准。富时中国国企开放共赢指数由100只成分股构成，包括80个A股公司和20个在香港上市的中国公司。
Sir Elton John and his husband David Furnish。新收录的资料是该领域的重要参考
В результате суд отказал в удовлетворении иска, ссылаясь на закон «О защите прав потребителей», который не распространяется на рекламные акции. Мезенцеву заявили, что организатор акции вправе изменять правила или прекратить ее проведение. Россиянин пытался обжаловать решение, но апелляцию отклонили.
，推荐阅读PDF资料获取更多信息
Трамп объяснил выбор названия операции в Иране01:56
To put all this in the right context, let’s zoom in on the copyright's actual perimeters: the law says you must not copy “protected expressions”. In the case of the software, a protected expression is the code as it is, with the same structure, variables, functions, exact mechanics of how specific things are done, unless they are known algorithms (standard quicksort or a binary search can be implemented in a very similar way and they will not be a violation). The problem is when the business logic of the programs matches perfectly, almost line by line, the original implementation. Otherwise, the copy is lawful and must not obey the original license, as long as it is pretty clear that the code is doing something similar but with code that is not cut & pasted or mechanically translated to some other language, or aesthetically modified just to look a bit different (look: this is exactly the kind of bad-faith maneuver a court will try to identify). I have the feeling that every competent programmer reading this post perfectly knows what a *reimplementation* is and how it looks. There will be inevitable similarities, but the code will be clearly not copied. If this is the legal setup, why do people care about clean room implementations? Well, the reality is: it is just an optimization in case of litigation, it makes it simpler to win in court, but being exposed to the original source code of some program, if the exposition is only used to gain knowledge about the ideas and behavior, is fine. Besides, we are all happy to have Linux today, and the GNU user space, together with many other open source projects that followed a similar path. I believe rules must be applied both when we agree with their ends, and when we don’t.，推荐阅读新收录的资料获取更多信息